HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15930 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing State-respondents and perused the record on board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs: "i. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to consider and finally decide the petitioner's medical reimbursement claim relating to treatment from 24.09.2025 to 25.01.2026 and also release the admissible medical reimbursement amount of Rs.58,533/-, as recommended after technical examination, subject to verification in accordance with the applicable Rules. ii. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to pass an appropriate order on the representation of the petitioner dated 21.08.2026 (Annexure No.4) expeditiously within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 2 and 4 and learned Standing Counsel representing State-respondents No. 1 and 3 have contended that the grievance of the present petitioner regarding non-reimbursement of his medical claim can be more appropriately redressed by the Municipal Commissioner (respondent No. 2), and he has no objection, in case, a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation to be moved by the petitioner within such stipulated period as may be directed by this Court. 4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mushir Ahmad Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Srivastava Smt. Gohar Khanam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) on the merits of the case, with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the Municipal Commissioner (respondent No. 2), to ventilate his grievance, as averred in the present writ petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the present writ petition, and, in turn, he shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of production of such representation. 5. 5. With the aforesaid observation, present writ petition is disposed of. September 30, 2026 vinay WRIA No. 15930 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad