HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39110 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the inaction on the representation filed by the petitioner before the Commissioner of Police, Commissionarate, Ghaziabad. 2. Learned Standing Counsel and Sri J.N. Maurya, who appears for the pollution Board, state that the representation be filed before District Magistrate, Ghaziabad, and he would be the competent authority to decide the same. 3. Without going into the merits of the case, we direct that if the petitioner files a representation before District Magistrate, Ghaziabad, within 10 days from today, then the representation of the petitioner shall be decided in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders within one month thereafter. 4. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. September 28, 2026 Irshad Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., J.N. Maurya (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Niranjan Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IRSHAD AHMAD SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad