HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10289 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. At the very outset, the Learned A.G.A. has raised an objection that the offences alleged against the applicants are not punishable with imprisonment exceeding seven years as the offences in question had been committed before the amendment of 2020. The applicants have been absconding for the past 14 years. It is further submitted that the chargesheet has been filed and there is no apprehension of arrest of the applicants, therefore, the present application seeking anticipatory bail is not maintainable. 2. After some arguments, Learned counsel for the applicants prays that the applicants may be permitted to approach the concerned Court and apply for regular bail, which may be directed to be decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773. He further prays that for a short time, the interest of the applicants may be protected. 3. The learned A.G.A. has no objection to the said prayer. 4. Taking into account the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that in case the applicants appear in Case Crime no.282 of 2012, under Section 3/5A/8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955, Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals Act, 1960, Police Station Karimuddinpur, District Ghazipur, before the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shri Niwash Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vijaykant Yadav And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and apply for bail, their application for bail shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, and also subsequent orders of the Supreme Court in the aforementioned case, without being influenced by any observations made by the concerned Court while rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 5. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands disposed of. October 1, 2026 A. Pandey NABAIL No. 10289 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad