Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9976 (KAR)

VENKAPPA BELCHADA v. SMT JAYANTHI

WP/542/2022 · 2026-03-03

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12875 W.P. No.542/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.542/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: VENKAPPA BELCHADA S/O LATE MARU BELCHADA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT PADU BERKE MANE PADU, BONDANTHILA VILLAGE MANGALURU - 575029. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VISHWAJITH RAI M, ADV.,) AND: 1. SMT. JAYANTHI W/O LATE RAMA BELCHADA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS. 2. UMAVATHI D/O LATE RAMA BELCHADA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. 3. UMAKARA S/O LATE RAMA BELCHADA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 4. ASHOKA S/O LATE RAMA BELCHADA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12875 W.P. No.542/2022 5. VANITHA D/O LATE RAMA BELCHADA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. 6. RAVI S/O LATE RAMA BELCHADA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 7. NARAYANA BELCHADA S/O LATE MARU BELCHADA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. 8. VISHWANATHA S/O LATE SANJEEVA AGED MAJOR. 9. NAGESH S/O LATE SANJEEVA AGED MAJOR. 10. MOHAN S/O LATE SANJEEVA AGED MAJOR. 11. MEENAKSHI D/O LATE SANJEEVA AGED MAJOR. 12. MAMATHA D/O LATE SANJEEVA AGED MAJOR. 13. SUNDARA BELCHADA S/O LATE KAMALA AGED MAJOR. 14. MADEVI D/O LATE KAMALA AGED MAJOR. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12875 W.P. No.542/2022 15. MOHINI D/O LATE KAMALA AGED MAJOR. ALL ARE R/AT. PADU BERKE MANE PADU, BONDANTHILA VILLAGE MANGALURU - 575029. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJENDRA S, ADV., FOR R13 - R15 R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10 & R11 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS WHICH ULTIMATELY RESULTED IN PASSION OF THE ORDER ANNEXURE-A. ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE ORDER ANNEXURE-A DTD.6.11.2021 MADE ON IA NO.16 IN O.S.NO.33/2011 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM D.K. MANGALURU & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12875 W.P. No.542/2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intends to withdraw the writ petition and he has filed a memo to that effect. 2. Memo reads as under: "The Counsel for Petitioner seeks the leave of this Hon'ble court to withdraw the above mentioned writ petition in the light of the settlement between the parties. Therefore This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the withdrawal of the above mentioned writ petition as sought for by keeping all question open in the interest of justice and Equity." 3. Memo is placed on record. 4. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1