Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9976 (BOM)

M/S. ANSHOOL METALS PVT. LTD. AND ORS. v. JANTA SAHAKARI BANK LTD. THROUGH MR. BABURAO SHANKAR WABLE

IA/5375/2024 · 2026-09-17

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

36-REVN-579-2019.doc Rohit Ghuge IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 579 OF 2019 Anushool Metals Pvt. Ltd & Ors. ...Applicants Versus Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. And Anr ...Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5375 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1493 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 579 OF 2019 Anushool Metals Pvt. Ltd & Ors. ...Applicants Versus Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. And Anr ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Akhil Sarathy a/w Mr. Zubiya Khatib i/b Thodur Law Associates, for Applicants. None for Respondent No.1. Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP, for Respondent No.2/State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J. DATE : 17th SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C. : INTERIM APPLICATION MO. 5375 OF 2024 1. This is an Application preferred by the Applicants, who have filed the accompanying Revision Application No. 579 of 2019. By way of this Application, the Applicants seek to carry out amendments to the ROHIT RAMDAS GHUGE Digitally signed by ROHIT RAMDAS GHUGE Date: 2026.09.19 17:21:09 +0530 36-REVN-579-2019.doc Rohit Ghuge Revision Application, which are set out in the Schedule response part of the Amendment Application. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicants. 3. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the Applicants that the amendments essentially seek to introduce further grounds and contentions in the Revision Application. Upon being confronted with the fact that, the amendment sought are in the nature of contentions and grounds which can be canvassed by him during the course of the final hearing of the Revision Application, learned counsel for the Applicants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the Amendment Application with liberty to raise such grounds and contentions as are available to him in law during the course of the final arguments in the accompanying Revision Application. Needless to say that, the learned counsel for the Applicants is at liberty to advance all such contentions and grounds as are available to him in accordance law and in consonance with the record in the present case. 4. In view thereof, Interim Application No. 5375 of 2024 is disposed of as withdrawn. Criminal Revision Application No. 579 of 2019 36-REVN-579-2019.doc Rohit Ghuge to be listed for further consideration on 01st October, 2026. 5. It is also brought to my notice by the learned counsel for the Applicants that during the pendency of the Revision Application, Applicant No. 2 - Jayram Subhaiya Hegde has expired. He seeks some time to make an amendment application to bring this fact on record along with the death certificate. ( ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J.)