[2026:RJ-JP:24974] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6716/2026 URN: CRLMB / 12134U / 2026 Nadeem S/o Akhtar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Garh Ajan Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6717/2026 URN: CRLMB / 12135U / 2026 Musraf S/o Hifjul, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Nandera Bas, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Mr. Manish Gutpa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 06/07/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 23.04.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kama, District Deeg, in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.575/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioners was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.145/2026, Police Station – Kama, District Deeg for the offences [2026:RJ-JP:24974] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6716/2026] under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners of having committed any offence of similar or any other nature in past. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is only one complaint against the present petitioners registered on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal, and the total amount involved is approximately Rs.2,995/- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the challan has already been filed in the present case. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by the Magistrate. Therefore, he prays that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail as the accused-petitioners are in custody since 05.04.2026. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the present bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case and upon consideration of the arguments advanced and particularly the fact that there are no criminal antecedents ; offences are triable by the Magistrate ; challan has already been filed and the trial will take considerable time, this Court is of the opinion that the present bail application filed by the petitioners deserves to be allowed. [2026:RJ-JP:24974] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6716/2026] 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely - (i) Nadeem S/o Akhtar and (ii) Musraf S/o Hifjul, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.145/2026, Police Station – Kama, District Deeg shall be released on bail ; provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioners shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioners shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected; (iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioners are found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 14-15/JUBIN