Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9973 (ALL)

SMT RAMRATI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

A227/12677/2026 · 2026-09-29

Vikram D Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12677 of 2026 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present petition is filed with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 3/learned JM-F.T.C. (Crime Against Women), Basti, to consider and decide the proceedings of Parivad Case No. 42 of 2026, Ramrati Versus Maya Devi, under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, expeditiously, preferably within a time-bound period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, strictly in accordance with law and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party, subject to the cooperation of the parties. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the learned court below to proceed with the aforesaid case on the date fixed and make all endeavour for its expeditious disposal; otherwise the petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proceedings before the court concerned be directed to be concluded in a time bound manner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the complainant before the court concerned. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Tiwari, Mohan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt Ramrati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) of learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the JM-F.T.C. (Crime Against Women), Basti to decide the Parivad Case No. 42 of 2026 (Ramrati Vs. Maya Devi), under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. September 30, 2026 VMA A227 No. 12677 of 2026 2 (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHWA MOHAN ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad