HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10104 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicant, the Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.155 of 2026, under Sections 191(1), 191(3), 126(2), 109(1), 352, 121(1), 121(2), 132, 125, 125-A, 125-B of the B.N.S. and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S.- Cholapur, District- Varanasi, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehends his arrest in the above-mentioned case. 3. The Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is a minor aged about fourteen years, nine months and seventeen days. The applicant has been nominated in the first information report with ten other named accused and forty to fifty unknown persons. General allegations of assault have been made in the FIR. The police which is said to have been assaulted by a mob has indiscriminately nominated the accused. Similarly situated co-accused Smt. Sukha Devi, Smt. Sageena , Minor Sanjit @ Prashant Kumar, Rajan and Sajan have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7597 of 2026, 7811 of 2026, 8049 of 2026 and 8060 of 2026 respectively. None of the injuries received by the police personnel could be stated to be dangerous to life. The applicant has a criminal history of one other case in which the applicant is on anticipatory bail. 4. The Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail, however, does not dispute the age of the applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mritunjay Kumar Singh, Nitin Anand, Om Prakash Prajapati, Poonam Maurya, Pradeep Kumar, Vivek Coleston Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amarjeet (Minor) .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned Counsel for the parties. 6. General role has been given to the applicant. Similarly situated co-accused Smt. Sukha Devi, Smt. Sageena , Minor Sanjit @ Prashant Kumar, Rajan and Sajan have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7597 of 2026, 7811 of 2026, 8049 of 2026 and 8060 of 2026 respectively. The applicant is a minor stated to be aged about fifteen years. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. 7. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. 8. In the event of the arrest of the applicant Amarjeet (Minor), he shall be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:- i. the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. that the applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. 10. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. September 28, 2026 Junaid NABAIL No. 10104 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad