HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8999/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16504U / 2026 1. Jahid S/o Khurshid, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Bilang, Police Station Kaman District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Is Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Mukim @ Vakim S/o Paltu, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bilang, Police Station Kaman District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Is Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9473/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17516U / 2026 Farukh S/o Saudan, Aged About 99 Years, R/o Vilang, Ps Kaman, District Deeg. (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan Mr. Amit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 09/07/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 30.05.2026 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge Kama, District- Deeg, in Bail Application No.786/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.339/2017, Police Station-Kama, District-Deeg for the offences under Sections 364A, 365, 420, 341, 395, 120B IPC. (2 of 4) [CRLMB-8999/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is limited to snatching an amount of Rs.2,000/- and nothing more. He further submits that the co- accused have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He also submits that one of the co-accused, namely, Azruddin, has been enlarged on anticipatory bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.01.2018. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the case of the petitioners is on no lessor footing than that of the co- accused, namely, Azruddin, as the allegations against all the four accused-petitioners are identical in the FIR. Learned counsel fairly submits that one criminal cases of the year 2010 under Section 376 IPC is pending against Jahid and no case against Mumkin and one case against Faruk is pending. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that, except for the aforesaid cases, no other criminal case involving offences of a similar nature or any other offence is pending against the accused-petitioners. Learned counsel further submits that two accused persons, namely, Nasim S/o Ummar and Anish S/o Jamil, have already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 13.10.2017 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, and accused Azruddin has also been enlarged on anticipatory bail vide order dated 02.01.2018. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the challan in the present case has already been filed. He further submits that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take considerable time. Therefore, he prays that the petitioners, who are in custody since 08.05.2026, may be enlarged on bail. (3 of 4) [CRLMB-8999/2026] 6. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 7. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 8. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, that the charge-sheet has already been filed; conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and further the fact that the two accused persons, namely, Nasim S/o Ummar and Anish S/o Jamil, have already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 13.10.2017 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, and accused Azruddin has also been enlarged on anticipatory bail vide order dated 02.01.2018; therefore, this Court deems it appropriate that the accused-petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 9. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners - (i) Jahid S/o Khurshid, (ii) Mukim @ Vakim S/o Paltu and (iii) Farukh S/o Saudan arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.339/2017, Police Station Kama, District Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions: (i) The petitioners shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (4 of 4) [CRLMB-8999/2026] (ii) The petitioners shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and (iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 39-40/JUBIN