Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9961 (ALL)

DABLU SAROJ @ ALOK SAROJ AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/33448/2026 · 2026-09-27

Vivek Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33448 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sanjay Kumar Rajbhar, learned counsel for the informant, and learned A.G.A. for the State are present. 2. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the applicant prays that the present application be dismissed as not pressed. 3. The prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant has not been opposed by the learned counsel for the informant as well as the learned A.G.A. 4. In view of the above, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed. September 28, 2026 Radhika Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Amit Kumar, G.A., Sanjay Kumar Rajbhar (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Dablu Saroj @ Alok Saroj And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad