HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15729 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Abhishek Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2; Ms. Tanisha Jahangir Monir, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 3 and 4; learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs: "i. Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the respondents to consider and grant the 3rd Time Scale to the petitioner from the date of eligibility/entitlement i.e. 18.03.2007; ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the respondents to re-fix the petitioners pay/salary after granting benefit of 3rd Time Scale/financial Upgradation and pay the same from the date of entitlement/eligibility and also pay all the consequential arrears, increments and other service benefits accrued there from with interest @ 12% per annum till the date of actual payment; iii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the respondent authorities to make the payment of arrears of difference of salary of the period of suspension i.e. from 24.09.2005 to 12.10.2006 with interest @ 12% per annum till the date of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar, Rahul Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhishek Srivastava, C.S.C., Tanisha Jahangir Monir Yatish Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) actual payment; iv. Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction in favour of the petitioner as this Ho'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case to meet the ends of justice;" 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have contended that the grievance of the present petitioner regarding grant of the benefit of third time pay scale and its consequential benefits arising therefrom, as well as payment of salary for the period from 24.09.2005 to 12.10.2006, during which period he remained under suspension can more appropriately be redressed by the Chairman/Managing Director (respondent no. 2), and that they have no objection if a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation, to be moved by the present petitioner, within such stipulated period, as may be directed by this Court. 4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, with liberty to the present petitioner to move a fresh representation before the Chairman/Managing Director (respondent no. 2), ventilating his grievances, as raised in this petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the instant writ petition, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of production of the same, if there is no other legal impediment. 5. With the aforesaid directions and observations, present writ petition stands disposed of. September 28, 2026 Neetu WRIA No. 15729 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- NEETU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad