Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010122882024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/451/2026 JOHORA BEGUM W/O LATE JAKIR ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JAYANTIPUR, PO KUWARITOL, PS KALIABOR, DIST NAGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI 3:THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMIN) ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI 4:THE COMMISSIONER OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (CITY) GUWAHATI ASSAM 5:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE (DLC) FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT KAMRUP M . REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP M ASSAM 6:SMTI SARASWATI BARMAN O/O THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (CITY) GUWAHATI ASSAM PO PANBAZAR Page No.# 2/4 GUWAHATI 0 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D P BORAH, MR U GHOSH Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, Linked Case : WP(C)/2360/2024 JOHORA BEGUM W/O LATE JAKIR ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JAYANTIPUR PO KUWARITOL PS KALIABOR DIST NAGAON ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI 3:THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMIN) ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI 4:THE COMMISSIONER OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (CITY) GUWAHATI ASSAM 5:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE (DLC) FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT KAMRUP M . REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP M ASSAM Page No.# 3/4 6:SMTI SARASWATI BEGUM O/O THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (CITY) GUWAHATI ASSAM PO PANBAZAR GUWAHATI 01 ------------ Advocate for : MR. D P BORAH Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS Page No.# 4/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 25.02.2026 Heard Mr. D.P Borah, learned counsel for the applicant. This interlocutory application has been filed seeking correction of the name of the private respondent namely, Smti Saraswati Barman whose name was wrongly reflected as Smti Saraswati Begum in W.P(C) No. 2360/2024. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that this error has crept in due to oversight and upon being noticed, this interlocutory application has been seeking correction. Mr. R Dhar, learned counsel for the respondent/opposite party does not object to the prayer made. Accordingly, the applicant is permitted to file amended cause title showing the corrected name of respondent No. 6 as Smti Saraswati Barman instead of Smti Saraswati Begum in W.P(C) No. 2360/2024. Let the amended cause title be filed within a period of one week from today before the Registry. Interlocutory application accordingly stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant