Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9958 (CAL)

FARUK RAHAMAN MONDAL AND ORS. v. SUNITA MAJHI, DEPUTY SECRETARY AND SPIO AND ANR.

CPAN/168/2026 · 2026-04-22

Krishna Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AD -11-12 Ct No.25 22.04.2026 (SSS) CPAN 168 of 2026 Faruk Rahaman Mondal and Ors. Vs. Smt. Sunita Majhi and Anr. in WPA 10374 of 2025 with CPAN 256 of 2026 Md. Habil Vs. Md. Sazzad Siddique and Anr. Mr. Anindya Bose, Mr. Golam Mohiuddin, Mr. Mridul Biswas ….For the petitioner in Item no. 11. Mr. Vishak Bhattacharya, Ms. Priyanka Bhattacharya …For the petitioner in Item no. 12. Ms. Madhurima Sarkar ….For the alleged contemnor nos. 1 and 2 in both matters. In Re: CPAN 168 of 2026 in WPA 10374 of 2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present contempt application on the allegation of violation of the order passed by this Court dated 11 th November, 2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the contempt application, the alleged contemnors have complied with the order passed by this Court. Learned counsel appearing for the alleged contemnors have filed affidavit of compliance and submits that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. 2. Considering the above, this Court finds that the alleged contemnors have already complied with the order. Nothing remains in the present contempt application. CPAN 168 of 2026 in WPA 10374 of 2025 is disposed of. Rule, if any, be discharged. Affidavit of compliance be kept with the record. In Re: CPAN 256 of 2026 3. The petitioner has filed the present contempt application on the allegation of non-compliance of the order dated 11th November, 2025. He submits that after filing of the contempt application, the alleged contemnors have complied with the order dated 11th November, 2025. 4. In view of the above, CPAN 256 of 2026 is disposed of. Rule, if any, stands issued and discharged. (Krishna Rao, J.) 2