HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10306 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard, Sri Vinay Kumar Jaiswal, the Learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anand Pal Singh, the Learned counsel appearing for the informant, the Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case No.7931 of 2026, arising out of Case Crime No.44 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 352, 110, 117(2) B.N.S., P.S.- Ahirauli Bazar, District- Kushinagar, with a prayer to enlarge her on anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehends her arrest in the above-mentioned case. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that a petty dispute has led to the lodging of the false First Information Report implicating the applicant. None of the injured have received any injury which may be dangerous to life. Learned counsel has further submitted that the applicant is a lady having no criminal antecedents. She was not arrested during investigation and would join the trial, if any, and assist in its expeditious disposal. 4. Learned counsel for the informant and the Learned A.G.A. have opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail and have contended that Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jitendra Singh, Vinay Kumar Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anand Pal Singh, G.A., Harish Chandra Singh Geeta .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) three persons have been brutally assaulted by the applicant and the other co-accused. The injuries correspond to the weapons assigned. There was no provocation. Deepika has received a fracture on the left hand. The injuries are grievous in nature and other injuries have been found on the vital part of the body of the injured. No indulgence may be granted and the anticipatory bail application may be dismissed. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned counsel for the parties and perused the material brought on the record. 6. The applicant is a lady having no criminal antecedents. In the prima facie view of the Court, taking note of the number of injured and the injuries sustained by the injured, the case of the applicant stands on a separate footing to that of the co-accused. There appears to be previous enmity between the parties and the implication of the applicant who is a lady may be on account of this enmity. 7. Taking into account all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it fit to enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail. 8. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. 9. In the event of the arrest of the applicant Geeta, she shall be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:- i. the applicant shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; NABAIL No. 10306 of 2026 2 ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. that the applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. 11. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. October 1, 2026 Sachin NABAIL No. 10306 of 2026 3 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad