Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9955 (RAJ)

AARIF S/O SHRI ALI MOHAMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10180/2026 · 2026-07-06

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:25146] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 10180/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18889U / 2026 1. Aarif S/o Shri Ali Mohamad, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Gadhi Mewat, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). 2. Sarif S/o Shri Ali Mohamad, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Gadhi Mewat, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). ---Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arfat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 06/07/2026 1. The instant 2nd bail application has been filed against the order of the trial court dated 22.04.2026 on behalf of the accused- petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 85/2026 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 308(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a), 313, 303(2) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioners [2026:RJ-JP:25146] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10180/2026] are in custody since long; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners; that co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions preferred by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and material available on record; that the accused- petitioners are in custody since 09.04.2026; that charge-sheet against the accused-petitioners has already been filed; that similarly situated co-accused persons namely Maksood @ Kada, Abbash, Javed and Ansar and two other co-accused persons who are juvenile have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 15.06.2026 and 28.04.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8952/2026 and in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 786/2026 respectively; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant 2nd bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners namely Aarif S/o Shri Ali Mohamad and Sarif S/o Shri Ali Mohamad are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them [2026:RJ-JP:25146] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10180/2026] furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 137/RACHNA