Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9950 (CAL)

SULATI MANDI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/1028/2026 · 2026-04-22

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

22.04.2026 36 sdas WPA 1028 of 2026 Sulati Mandi Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury Ms. Shreyeta Mitra Ms. Pritha Biswas Ms. Upasana Sarkar …. for the petitioner Mr. Satyajit Mahata …. for the State Mr. Kanak Kiran Bandyopadhyay …. for WBCSSC Mr. Kunal Ganguly ….. for the WBBSE 1. Let affidavit-of-service, as filed in Court, be kept on record. 2. In spite of service, none appears on behalf of the school authorities. 3. The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher. She had applied for general transfer on the distance ground. Such application has been pending since January 2026. The school has not taken any decision in the matter. 4. Respondent no. 6, the Head of the Institution, is directed to dispose of the application of the petitioner by May 30, 2026 in accordance with law. If found eligible, the case of the petitioner 2 shall be forwarded to the concerned District Inspector of Schools (S.E.) by the school authorities along with the application and the requisite “No Objection Certificate” by June 15, 2026. 5. Temporary suspension of „Utsashree Portal‟ will not be an impediment for the concerned authority to consider the application for transfer of the petitioner. The same shall be considered in an offline mode. 6. With the aforestated directions, the writ petition is, thus, disposed of. 7. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)