- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14314 WP No. 13282 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 13282 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. VENUGOPAL S.R. S/O LATE RATHANACHAR S.V., AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT MARUTHI NILAYA, OPP: NUCIFERA SOLAR SYSTEM, RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR, NEAR NALANDA CONVENT, TUMAKURU - 572 102. 2. SMT. SUDHA H. W/O VENUGOPAL S.R. AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT MARUTHI NILAYA, OPP: NUCIFERA SOLAR SYSTEM, RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR, NEAR NALANDA CONVENT, TUMAKURU - 572 102. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. FAYAZ SAB B.G., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI. SHARADA MAHILA CO-OPERAATIVE BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISION OF CO- OPERATIVE SOCIEITES ACT, 1956, SRI. JAYACHAMARAJENDRA ROAD, Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14314 WP No. 13282 of 2022 TUMAKURU -572 101. 2. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER SRI. SHARADA MAHILA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., SRI. JAYACHAMARAJENDRA ROAD, TUMAKURU -572 101. …RESPONDENTS (R1 & R2 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE CASE AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED PUBLICATION TO AUCTION THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY TO BE HELD ON 13.7.2022 TO SELL THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FOR THROWAWAY PRICE EVEN THOUGH THE ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONERS IS NOT CLASSIFIED AS NONE PERFORMING ASSETS WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-D, AS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY, CAPRICIOUS, WITHOUT APPLICATION OF MIND AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14314 WP No. 13282 of 2022 ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is of the year 2022. An interim order was passed on 05.07.2022 and another order was passed on 09.09.2022. Though the notice has been served on the respondents, no vakalath is filed on their behalf. On 09.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf both the parties and this Court directed that the matter to be listed under the caption for 'dismissal’ on 10.03.2026. Today also, there is no representation. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6