Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9941 (AP)

S NOOR MAHAMMAD v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/24668/2026 · 2026-09-09

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010451122026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 24668/2026 Between: 1. S NOOR MAHAMMAD, S/O LATE S MAHABOOB BASHA AGE 28 YEARS OCC CULTIVATION R/O 5 606 VANKAGADDA STREET GOOTY RS GOOTY MANDAL ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 515401 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT 522237 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 515401 3. THE TAHSILDHAR MANDAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, GOOTY MANDAL ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 515401 4. P VENKATA RAMANA, S/O P HAMPAIAH AGE 55 YEARS OCC BUSINESS R/O 15 605 GOOTY RS GOOTY MANDAL ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 515401 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of Officials of Respondent No.3 in interfering with civil dispute there by demanding Petitioner to forfeit his rights in favor of Respondent No.4 with respect to Petitioner's Agriculture Land in Survey No.247 B 1A admeasuring an extent of Ac 3 76 Cents situated at Chetnepalli Revenue Village Gooty Mandal Anantapur District the Suit Subject Properties of OS.No.38 of 2010 on the file of The Court of Junior Civil Judge Gooty as illegal arbitrary and consequently direct the Officials of Respondent No.3 to not to interfere with Petitioner's Agriculture Land in Survey No.247 B 1A admeasuring an extent of Ac 3 76 Cents situated at Chetnepalli Revenue Village Gooty Mandal Anantapur District IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Officials of Respondent No.3 to not to interfere with Petitioner's Agriculture Land in Survey No.247 B 1A admeasuring an extent of Ac 3 76 Cents situated at Chetnepalli Revenue Village Gooty Mandal Anantapur District Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER Heard Sri N.Chandra Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Chandra Sekhar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 3rd respondent is attempting to dispossess the petitioner from an extent of Ac.3.76 cents in S.No.247-B-1A of Chetnepalli Revenue Village, Gooty Mandal, Anantapur District, without following due procedure. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner’s father was assigned the aforementioned land and after the demise of his father, the petitioner has been in possession and enjoyment of the same. He would submit that the petitioner’s name was updated in the Records of Rights and ROR 1B and pattadar pass book are filed as Exs.P1 and P2. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents submitted the written instructions of 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, wherein it was stated thus: “It is submitted that the Tahsildar, Gooty Mandal has not issued any proceedings in respect of the land in Sy.No.247-A and not disturbed the existing status of the said land. In the event that any proceedings are required to be initiated in respect of the said land, the same will be undertaken strictly in accordance with the provisions of the relevant law, after duly intimating the writ petitioner and affording him/her sufficient opportunity to submit his/her version. … …” 5. Given the instructions of the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, keeping the writ petition and inviting a counter will not serve any purpose. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side, directing the 3rd respondent not to interfere with an extent of Ac.3.76 cents in S.No.247-B-1A of Chetnepalli Revenue Village, Gooty Mandal, Anantapur District, without following due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD