Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9940 (RAJ)

MOHAMMAD JABIR S/O RASEED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8504/2026 · 2026-07-08

Bipin Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:25510] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8504/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15465U / 2026 Mohammad Jabir S/o Raseed, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Ghatmika, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg (Raj.), Presently Resident Luhesar Police Station Kaman District Deeg (Raj.) (The Accused-Petitioner Presently Confined In District Jail, Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aarif Mohammed Mr. Bhanu Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 08/07/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 19.05.2026 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge Brijnagar, District Deeg, in Bail Application No. 298/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.106/2025, Police Station-Nagar, District-Deeg for the offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2) & 61(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the complaint was lodged on the basis of the complaint filed before the Magistrate. He further submits that the main accused in FIR was named as Shahja and as per the complaint also amount taken from the complainant was asked to be refunded by Shahja. [2026:RJ-JP:25510] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8504/2026] He further submits that the Investigating Agency has deleted the name of Shahja. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan has already been filed and there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner of having committed the offence of similar nature or any other nature. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by a Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 01.05.2026. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate opposes the present bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; the conclusion of trial is likely to take a considerable time; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted. 6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Mohammad Jabir S/o Raseed arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.106/2025, Police Station Nagar, District Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the [2026:RJ-JP:25510] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8504/2026] stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 31/MAHIMA