HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 25069 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed with the liberty to file a fresh petition. 3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents has no objection in case the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. September 28, 2026 Sumit S Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Yadav, Ruchi Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudeep Harkauli, Tejasvi Misra (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Anand Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad