Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 ( 2026:HHC:15694 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 319 of 2026
Decided on: 11.05.2026 ________________________________________________ Leela Devi ....Petitioner Versus
Dr. Abhishek Jain & Ors. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of Office Order dated 18.02.2026, wherein, it has been stated that representation of the petitioner has been considered and rejected.
2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 ( 2026:HHC:15694 )
3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to assail the consideration order, in accordance with law, if she is still aggrieved.
4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any.
( Sushil Kukreja )
11th May, 2026 Judge (raman)