IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30319 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2017 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Parshuram Singh S/o Munarik Singh R/o Village - Chakdaulat, P.S - Bakhtiyarpur, District - Patna 2. Nanhaku Singh S/o Late Siya Sharan Singh R/o Village - Chakdaulat, P.S - Bakhtiyarpur, District - Patna ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar S.K., Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 08-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. In the present case, the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 39 of 2017, dated 11.02.2017, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per prosecution case, petitioners and other co- accused persons armed with pistol, country-made rifle, gadasa, lathi and danda etc. assaulted the informant. The petitioner Parshuram Singh and co-accused Balram Singh fired upon the informant and petitioner Nanhaku Singh gave him the gadasa blow causing injury to him. They also snatched his mobile Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30319 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 2/3 phone, gold locket and rupees three thousand cash from his pocket. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. No offence in the manner as alleged has ever taken place. No injury report is available on record and no specific injury has been attributed to any of the petitioners. The allegation of opening fire is levelled against two persons and is not specific against petitioner no. 1. Similarly, no gadasa injury has been found on the informant which has been attributed against the petitioner, Nanhaku Singh. Learned counsel further submits that the investigation has been continuing in this case and the investigating officer has been seeking injury report of this case, but no injury report has been brought on record till date. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners have no criminal history and similarly placed co-accused, namely Balram Singh has been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.04.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25627 of 2026. 5. Learned APP opposes the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30319 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 3/3 submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the absence of injury report and also the absence of fire-arm injury apparent from the rejection order and further considering the grant of privilege of anticipatory bail to a similarly placed co- accused, let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court concerned within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh (Patna), in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 39 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. and other following conditions: (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners. (ii) The petitioners will remain present on each and every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the learned trial Court. Shahnawaz/- (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U T