APHC010272382011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 26983/2011 Between: 1. K.V. NANCHARAIAH, S/O. KUMARASWAMY R/O.BANDALAI CHERUVU, AVANIGADDA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAM REP BY ITS, EXECUTIVE OFFICER 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER III TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI, DEVASTHANAM, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEERVI TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAM, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAGER TTD KALYANA MANDAPAM, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings in Roc.No.C2/216/EE.VI/VJA/08, dated 23.09.2011 issued by the Executive Engineer VI, Tirumala Tirupathi Devastanams, Tirupathi, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution apart from violative of powers & 2 functions of TTD Board Rules, 1990 and consequently declare that the petitioner is entitled for extension of licence period as per Powers & Functions of T.T.D. Board Rules, 1990 IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 33337 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the licence of the petitioner for a further period of one year in respect of the T.T.D. Kalayanamandamap, Avanigadda, Krishna District on the basis of payment of enhanced licence amount at the rate of 33.3% by suspending the proceedings in Roc.No.C2/216/EE.VI/VJA/08, dated 23.09.2011 issued by the Executive Engineer VI, Tirumala Tirupathi Devastanams, Tirupathi, Chittoor District Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KIRTHI TEJA KONDAVEETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A SUMANTH ( SC FOR TTD) 2. Y V RAVI PRASAD The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 26983/2011 ORDER: Ms.K.Mukundini, learned counsel, representing Sri A.Y.Vishesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that no cause survives for adjudication in the present writ petition and the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 07.09.2026 KA/KBN 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 26983/2011 Date: 07.09.2026 KA/KBN