Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9937 (ALL)

SATYDEV YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/9762/2026 · 2026-09-27

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9762 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicant, the Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants in Case Crime No. 158 of 2015, under Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station - Kotwali, District- Ghazipur, with a prayer to enlarge them on anticipatory bail as the applicants apprehend their arrest in the above-mentioned case. 3. The Learned AGA has raised a preliminary objection stating that the applicant had challenged the proceedings in Application U/S 482 No. 39713 of 2019, which was disposed of by this Court on 5.11.2019 granting three weeks' time to the applicant to appear before the concerned Court and apply for bail. The applicant did not appear and remained absconding for almost seven years and he may not be considered for grant of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has been unable to dispute the submissions made by the Learned AGA. 5. This Court in Application U/S 482 No. 39713 of 2019, while considering the challenge to the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1009 of 2019 as well as the charge sheet dated 18.01.2016, recorded the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant that he does not want to press the prayer with regard to quashing and sought a direction for consideration of bail. 6. The said order was passed on the request of the applicant and also interim protection was granted to enable the applicant to appear and apply for bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satydev Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) before concerned Court. Despite the order being passed on 5.11.2019, the applicant did not appear before the concerned Court and now after more than six years of the passing of the said order, no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. 7. Accordingly, the application stands rejected. September 28, 2026 Junaid NABAIL No. 9762 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad