Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9935 (ALL)

YOGESHWAR CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/15921/2026 · 2026-09-29

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15921 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This petition has been filed for the following reliefs: "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to forthwith calculate and release the petitioner's admissible arrears arising out of the First ACP/financial upgradation, granted pursuant to Financial Upgradation Sanction Order dated 19.10.2024 and consequential letter dated 25.10.2024, along with consequential benefits; ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to release the salary payable to the petitioner for the sanctioned earned leave period from 01.03.2025 to 23.03.2025, in accordance with law and further direct the respondents to provide all the consequential benefits to the petitioner as admissible under law; iii. Issue a writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 13.02.2026 by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a time-bound period, and thereafter release the amounts found admissible to the petitioner;" 2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that as petitioner has already represented, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate that respondent No. 2 be directed to consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law. 3. In view of these facts, respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Saurav Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Yogeshwar Chaudhary .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) decide the representation dated 13.02.2026 of the petitioner in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. It is made clear that this court has not examined the matter on merits and the order shall be passed strictly in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. September 30, 2026 Nitika Sri. WRIA No. 15921 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad