CRM-M-2361 IN THE (131 ) AJEET SING STATE OF P CORAM: Present : MANISHA B 1. passed by the FIR No.0088 Narcotic Drug District SBS forfeited to proclamation proclamation i 23619-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CR Da SINGH @ AJIT SINGH Versus
OF PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Namish Sodhi, Advocate for Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking quashin y the Learned Special Court, SBS N .0088 dated 30.07.2024 registered Drugs and Psychotropic Substances A SBS Nagar, whereby his bail was to the State on account of hi ation proceedings have been in ation is ordered to be issued for 13.07 JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-23619-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 06.05.2026 ... Petitioner
...Respondent E MANISHA BATRA
te for the petitioner nior DAG, Punjab uashing of order dated 03.01.2026 SBS Nagar in case arising out of tered under Section 21 of the ances Act at Police Station Rahon, l was cancelled and bonds were of his non-appearance. Now en initiated against him and 13.07.2026. AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.06 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-2361 2. petitioner is a doing seasonal could not app absence before reason narrated Trial Court an him. It is, ther 3. 4. asking of the learned State impugned orde the Learned T rightly recorde argued that ev petitioner. It allowed. 5. parties. 23619-2026 (O&M) (2) It is argued by learned counsel r is a labourer by profession. He ha asonal work to earn his livelihood. H ot appear before the Learned Trial C before the Learned Trial Court was n arrated above. He is ready to join pro urt and to abide by the terms and con is, therefore, argued that the petition de Notice of motion. Learned State counsel accepts n f the Court and is ready to argue th State counsel that there is no ille d order. The petitioner had been avo ned Trial Court in the past also and t ecorded that his absence was intentio that even proclamation proceedings h r. It is thus, stressed that the petiti This Court has heard the rival ounsel for the petitioner that the He had gone to Maharashtra for od. He could not return back and Trial Court on 03.01.2026. His was not intentional but due to the in proceedings before the Learned nd conditions to be imposed upon tion deserves to be allowed. epts notice of the petition on the rgue the matter. It is argued by o illegality or infirmity in the en avoiding his appearance before and the Learned Trial Court had intentional and willful. It is also ings have been issued against the petition does not deserve to be rival submissions made by the AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.06 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-2361 6. including the i there is no subsequent ord of the fact tha Learned Trial be imposed up giving directio a period of 10 personal as we and further o District Legal admitted to ba 7.

06.05.2026 Amit Sharma 23619-2026 (O&M) (3) On perusal of the orders passed g the impugned order, this Court is of no illegality or irregularity in the ent orders passed by the Learned Tria act that the petitioner is ready to join Trial Court and is ready to abide by sed upon him by the Trial Court, the irection to the petitioner to surrender b of 10 days from today and on doi l as well as surety bonds to the satisfac ther on depositing cost to the tune Legal Services Authority (DLSA), to bail by the Trial Court. A copy of this order be sent to the Whether speaking/reasoned:
   assed by the Learned Trial Court rt is of the considered opinion that in the impugned order and the d Trial Court. However, in view o join the proceedings before the de by the terms and conditions to urt, the petition is disposed of by nder before the Trial Court within n doing so and furnishing fresh atisfaction of Learned Trial Court tune of Rs.10,000/- before the LSA), SBS Nagar, he shall be t to the Learned Trial Court. (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE ned:- Yes/No

AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.06 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.