Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9930 (CAL)

BOJIRUDDIN MD. @MD BAJIRUDDIN v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

WPA/583/2026 · 2026-04-21

Ravi Krishan Kapur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

JPD-32 21.04.2026 Ct. No.06 spal IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 583 of 2026 BOJIRUDDIN MD. @ MD. BAJIRUDDIN Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. Bapi Sarkar, Adv. Mr. Roumyadip Saha, Adv. Mr. Probhat Singha, Adv. …for the petitioner. Mr. Nabankur Paul, Adv. Ms. Rima Sarkar, Adv. …for the State. 1. The grievance of the petitioner is directed against non-consideration of a representation dated 19 March, 2026. The petitioner complains of unauthorized construction. 2. On behalf of the State respondents it is submitted that the answering respondent is the Panchayat Samity being the respondent no.2 which is not represented. 3. In view of the submission made on behalf of the parties, WPA/583/2026 stands disposed of by directing the respondent no.2 to consider and dispose of the representation dated 19 March, 2026 in accordance with law. 2 4. It is made clear that there has been no adjudication on the merits of the case and all issues are left open for the respondent no.2 to be decided without being influenced by any observation made in this order. 5. The State respondents are directed to communicate this order to the respondent no.2. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)