Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9929 (RAJ)

FIROJ KHAN S/O RAEES MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6447/2026 · 2026-07-13

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:26176] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6447/2026 URN: CRLMB / 11596U / 2026 Firoj Khan S/o Raees Mohammad, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Badi Masjid Ki Gali, Suket, Police Station Suket, Kota Rural. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota, District Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.547/2025 registered at Police Station Udoyag Nagar (Kota City), District Kota City for offences under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2) and 109(1) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the name of the present petitioner does not find mention in the FIR and that no specific overt act has been attributed to him. He contends that the petitioner has been implicated solely on the basis of the statements of the witnesses, namely, Aaftab, Firoz Khan and Adil. However, the statements of all three witnesses have since been recorded before the learned trial Court, and they [2026:RJ-JP:26176] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6447/2026] have neither named the present petitioner nor supported the prosecution case, having turned hostile. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 10.12.2025. Though he has one criminal antecedent but he has already been enlarged on bail in the said case. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Firoj Khan S/o Raees Mohammad, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 15/Arun