Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.4510 of 2026
Prabhat Kumar Biswal …. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC
COROM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
ORDER 13.02.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:-
“It is therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:- i) direct the opp. parties to sanction pension and pensionary benefit as has been given to similarly situated persons vide Annexure-9 taking into
consideration his initial appointment 05.08.1994 along with his regular service as VLW for more than 15 years on being duly promoted to such post by the Collector-cum- District Magistrate, Gajapati vide
order dated 01.10.2010 in the light of the principles decided in O.A. No. 4394(c)/2010, decided on 17.02.2016, which has been affirmed by this Hon'ble court in W.P.(C)No. 6267 of 2018 and Hon'ble p. 2p. 2 Supreme court in SLP(C)No.28065 of 2019, decided on 18.05.2022 within a stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble court; ii). Pass such other order (s)/direction(s) as would be deem fit and proper in the bonafide interest of Justice; And for this act of kindness, as in duty bound, the petitioners shall ever pray.”
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.3 vide Annexure-10 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-10 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Jyoti