Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9925 (BOM)

VED PRAKASH v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/4472/2026 · 2026-09-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

24-WP-4472-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4472 OF 2026 Ved Prakash ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents —————— Mr. Yashpal Thakur a/w Abhishek Gupta & Ritisha Choudhary i/b MZM Legal LLP, for the Petitioner. Mr. S. S. Ghag, APP, for the Respondent-State. —————— Coram: Madhav J. Jamdar, J. Date: 22 September 2026 P.C.: 1. Mr. Thakur, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that there is an alternate remedy to challenge the impugned Order and, therefore, on instructions, he seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to avail the alternate remedy. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such with liberty as sought. 3. It is clarified that all contentions on merits are expressly kept open. [Madhav J. Jamdar, J.] Arjun 1 ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2026.09.22 20:03:08 +0530