Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9924 (UTT)

IRFAN ALI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2389/2026 · 2026-08-12

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010139022026 2026:UHC:7189 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2389/2026 Irfan Ali --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. M.S. Tyagi, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Vinod Kumar Jemini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sidhartha Singh, Advocate for the caveator. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State 2. Mr. M.S. Tyagi, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner after arguing for a while seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available to petitioner. 3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 4. It is made clear that observation made by Revisional Court will not come in the way of the authority while deciding the dispute. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 12.08.2026 Mahinder UKHC010139022026 2026:UHC:7189