Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9924 (CAL)

UMA DUTTA v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

WPA/617/2026 · 2026-04-21

Ravi Krishan Kapur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

JPD-09 21.04.2026 Ct. No.06 spal IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 617 of 2026 SMT. UMA DUTTA Vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Ms. Rajashree Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Alok Sah, Adv. …for the petitioner. Ms. Bedashruti Bose, Adv. Mr. Sandip Guha Roy, Adv. …for the State. 1. By consent of the parties, the order dated 20 April, 2026 stands corrected to reflect that it was submitted on behalf of the State respondents that investigation had already been concluded on 28 November, 2025 instead of 20 November, 2025. 2. The petitioner seeks directions before the respondent authorities to complete the investigation and file its Report before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalpaiguri. 3. In view of the submission made on behalf of the writ petitioner that the investigation has already been concluded, nothing survives in the writ petition. 4. WPA/617/2026 stands disposed of. 2 5. Liberty is granted to the writ petitioner to take appropriate steps in accordance with law insofar as the investigation and further steps are concerned if so advised. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)