Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9922 (CAL)

M/S. DINONATH BARMAN v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, COMMERCIAL TAXES AND STATE TAX W.B AND ORS

WPA/557/2026 · 2026-04-21

Ravi Krishan Kapur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

21.04.2026 In the High Court at Calcutta Item No. 19 Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Court No.06 Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction SK(AR(CR) Appellate Side WPA/557/2026 M/S. DINONATH BARMAN VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, COMMERCIAL TAXES AND STATE TAX W.B AND ORS Mr. Reshab Kumar, Mr. Subham Gupta, Mr. Debayan Goswami, …for the petitioner Mr. Subir Kumar Saha, Ms. Rima Sarkar, ….for the State. 1. The grievance of the petitioner is directed against an order dated 15 January, 2026 passed under Section 107 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It is fairly submitted by both the parties that in terms of the extant notification the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax, Appellate Tribunal is functional and the petitioner should approach the same. 2. In view of the above, WPA/557/2026 stands disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the West Bengal Goods Services Tax, Appellate Tribunal in accordance with law and after compliance with all statutory 2 formalities. It is made clear that there has been no expression on the merits of the case and all issues are left open for the Tribunal to decide in accordance with law. (RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)