Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9919 (RAJ)

GIRDHARI AND ORS v. KALYAN PRASAD AND ORS

CMA/762/2009 · 2026-07-10

Sudesh Bansal

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:25985] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 762/2009 URN: CMA / 951U / 2009 1. Girdhari son of kajodiya 2. Ramkesh son of balya 3. Harkesh son of balya 4. Pankhi son of Pahalwan All resident of Jiwali, Tehsil Gangapur city, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) ----Appellant Versus 1. Kalyan Prasad son of Brijwasi, resident of Ridayal Gurjar, Tehsil Gangapur city, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) 2. Land Holder, Tehsildar, Tehsil Gangapur city, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rahul Sharma for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Himmat Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 10/07/2026 1. By way of filling instant appeal, petitioners-plaintiffs challenged an order dated 25.11.2008 passed by the Additional District Judge, Gangapur city, Sawai madhopur, dismissing an application filed by petitioners-plaintiffs, seeking temporary injunction. 2. Counsel for petitioners states during course of present appeal, the original suit before the trial Court has been decided, therefore, in that view, the challenge to the order dated [2026:RJ-JP:25985] (2 of 2) [CMA-762/2009] 25.11.2008 made in the present petition, has rendered infructuous. The factum of the civil suit having been decided, stands proved by the copy of judgment dated 30.05.2026, produced by counsel for respondents. 3. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of as having become infructuous. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also also stand disposed of. 5. Record of trial Court be sent back. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/58