Ibrahim.A v. The State rep by the Inspector of Police
CRL OP/8681/2026 · 2026-04-07
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9919 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9919 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.8681 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.8681 of 2026 Ibrahim A ... Petitioner Vs. State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, B-1 North Beach Police Station, Chennai. Crime No.383 of 2025 ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in the above Cr.No.383 of 2025 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sebastin Raj For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections Section 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B), 25, 29(1) of NDPS Act, in Crime No.383 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.8681 of 2026
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused was found in illegal possession of 700 grams of ganja. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and there is no recovery from him and he has been implicated based on the confession statement of other accused. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court and hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would reiterate the prosecution case and opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner and it is a case arising under NDPS Act, this Court is of the view that the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.8681 of 2026
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 07.04.2026 sma To 1.The Inspector of Police, B-1 North Beach Police Station, Chennai. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.8681 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN.J. sma Crl.O.P.No.8681 of 2026 07.04.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis