Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9918 (RAJ)

HARIOM SHARMA S/O SHRI LAJJARAM SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10618/2026 · 2026-07-13

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:26310] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10618/2026 URN: CRLMB / 19708U / 2026 1. Hariom Sharma S/o Shri Lajjaram Sharma, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Hundawal Nagar, Dholpur District Dholpur Rajasthan ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Dholpur) 2. Rahul Sharma S/o Shri Hariom Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Hundawal Nagar, Dholpur District Dholpur Rajasthan ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Dholpur) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/07/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.209/2022 registered at Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur for offences under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioners is that they had purchased a certain quantity of mustard from the [2026:RJ-JP:26310] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10618/2026] complainant and thereafter neither paid the amount due for the mustard nor returned the mustard. It is submitted that the dispute is purely civil in nature. Petitioners are behind the bars since 19.06.2026 without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Hariom Sharma S/o Shri Lajjaram Sharma and Rahul Sharma S/o Shri Hariom Sharma, be released on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 55/Arun