Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9918 (PNJ)

DEEPAK KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/19011/2026 · 2026-04-16

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

221 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DEEPAK KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Harsh Vashistha, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG, Haryana. MANDEEP PANNU, After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. All pending applications, if any, also stand 16.04.2026 himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DEEPAK KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Harsh Vashistha, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG, Haryana. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. All pending applications, if any, also stand ( Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-19011-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 16.04.2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be HIMANSHU 2026.04.16 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document