34. CRI APPLN-280-26.odt Amberkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 280 OF 2026 Anjum Ayub Mulani alias Anjuman Shaikh .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....................  Ms. Pooja Khandekar a/w Ms. Pratiksha More i/by Mr. Subhash Hulyalkar (Hulyalkar & Associates), Advocates for Applicant  Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, APP for State  Mr. Nandkumar P. Kadam, API, Baner Police Station, Pune City. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 21, 2026 P. C. : 1. Heard Ms. Khandekar, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Talhar, learned APP for State. 2. Ms. Khandekar informs the Court that order passed on 11.06.2026 below Exh. 11 in Criminal Bail Application No. 2508 of 2026 stands complied with to the extent of depositing the cash surety of Rs. 1,00,000/-. The Applicant has been released. However, she submits that she is unable to furnish local solvent surety of Rs. 1,00,000/- which is one of the conditions as stated in operative clause 3 of the said order. Applicant has expressed her difficulty about not getting any solvent surety. Applicant is not the principal accused in the present crime, her husband is the principal accused. 1 of 2 34. CRI APPLN-280-26.odt 3. In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the Application, the Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (c). 4. Application is allowed partly and disposed of. Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 2 of 2 RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Digitally signed by RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Date: 2026.09.21 19:17:22 +0530