HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24729 of 2026 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party. 2. The present second bail application has been filed by the applicant under Section 483 BNSS to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 474 of 2024, under Sections 126(2), 109, 352 and 351(3) of B.N.S., P.S. Rath, District-Hamirpur. The first bail application was rejected vide order dated 02.04.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 41030 of 2025. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to some ulterior motive. The only new ground on which the application is seeking enlargement on bail through this application is that a charge in this case has been framed ono 01.07.2025 but not even a singly witness has been examined till date. He further submitted that no incriminating article or material has been recovered either from the applicant of on his pointing out. He lastly submitted that the applicant, who is in jail since 25.10.2024 and has no criminal antecedents to his discredit is entitled to be enlarged on bail during pendency of the trial. 4. On the other hand, the learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that in the F.I.R. itself it is alleged that the applicant-accused has assaulted the victim/injured person with a broken bottle, as a result of which the alleged victim sustained grievous injuries, wherein the Doctor Hari Narayan Rajpoot has given a statement that the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Tarun Jha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravindra .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) injuries caused to the injured Sanjay are dangerous to life and in view of the above, the applicant-accused is not entitled to be released on bail. 5. After having heard the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record, since the learned counsel for the applicant has not made out any new ground for enlargement of the applicant on bail, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused- applicant - Ravindra on bail during the trial. Hence, this bail application is rejected. September 25, 2026 Prashant D. BAIL No. 24729 of 2026 2 (Harvir Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRASHANT DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad