. ( 2026:HHC:17354 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.348 of 2026 Date of decision: 15.05.2026 Sumati Kumai ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sourav Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Issue notice. Mr. B.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents/State and has placed on record communication dated 14.05.2025 along with office order dated (nil), wherein, it has been stated that the in compliance to the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.15219/2025, titled as Sumanti Kumari vs. State of H.P. & Ors., the representation of the petitioner has been decided by the Deputy Director of School Education, Chamba, vide Order No.EDN-CBA(Ele.)E-3/4 (Speaking Order) 2024-25/172/173. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, as the judgment under reference has been duly complied with, no further order is required to 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 . ( 2026:HHC:17354 ) be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid consideration order, if she still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge May 15, 2026 (reena)