[2026:RJ-JP:25564] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8369/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15242U / 2026 Sugan @ Ramsugan S/o Moola, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Goolarghanta, Karauli, Police Station Kotwali, Karauli, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined At District Jail, Karauli). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma with Ms. Manju Chauhan, Ms. Mamta Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP Ms. Surbhi Khandelwal with Mr. Saurav Choudhary for the complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 08/07/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 20.05.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge Karauli (Rajasthan), in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No.232/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.32/2026, Police Station- Karauli Sadar, District Karauli for the offences under Sections 316(2) & 318(4) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 05.05.2026, offences are triable by Magistrate, challan has been filed. He further submits that, for the same offence, an FIR was initially lodged by one Kashmira, who is the [2026:RJ-JP:25564] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8369/2026] daughter-in-law of the present complainant, alleging an agreement to sell of the same land for the same consideration amount and claiming to have paid a sum of Rs. 51,00,000/- in cash. Thereafter, the present FIR was lodged by the father-in-law of Kashmira, alleging an agreement to sell the same land for the same consideration amount and payment of part consideration amounting to Rs. 55,20,000/- in cash. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petitioner has already been enlarged on bail in the FIR lodged by the daughter-in-law of the present complainant, bearing FIR No. 402/2024. He further submits that the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently as well as the learned counsel for the complainant opposes the present bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 01.05.2026; offences are triable by Magistrate; the challan has been filed; and the petitioner has already been enlarged on bail in FIR No. 402/2024, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted. 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely- Sugan @ Ramsugan S/o Moola arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.32/2026, Police Station Karauli Sadar, District Karauli, shall be released on bail; [2026:RJ-JP:25564] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8369/2026] provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/62