SIDDHARTH SAPRA v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.
W.P.(C)/5895/2026 · 2026-05-22
Amit Bansal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9902 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9902 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(C) 5895/2026 $~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5895/2026 SIDDHARTH SAPRA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Rimali Batra, Mr. Abhishek Lalwani and Ms. Chaitanya Bali, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Standing Counsel for R-1/MCD. Mr. Rohit Malik, Mr. Aryan Prasad, Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocates for R-
2. Mr. Abhijeet Dabas, Fire Operator. Mr. Arav Kapoor with Ms. Akshita Gupta, Advocates for R-3. Ms. Avni Singh, GNCTD with Mr. Abhimanyu Kapoor, Advocates for R-
4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 22.05.2026
1. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 30th April 2026, the subject property has been inspected by the respondent no.1/MCD and a status report has been filed by MCD.
2. In the aforesaid status report, it is stated that the subject property comprises the basement, ground floor to fourth floor and part fifth floor. The subject property is old and as per the record, no sanction plan has been obtained. The subject property has been booked for unauthorised This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/05/2026 at 13:14:20
W.P.(C) 5895/2026 construction and a show cause notice dated 15th May 2026 has been issued to the owner/occupier of the said property. It is further stated that misuse activity at the fourth floor (part) and terrace of the fourth floor in the shape of temporary structure/makeshift kitchen has been noticed, for which a show cause notice dated 20th May 2026 has been issued to the owners/occupiers of the subject property.
3. Counsel for the private respondent no.2 submits that a personal hearing be granted to the said respondent by MCD. He further submits that the respondent no.2 has stopped running the kitchen in the subject property.
4. In view of the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of in terms of the following directions: i. The private respondent no.2 is at liberty to reply to the aforesaid show cause notices. The reply shall be filed within two (2) weeks from today. ii. Based on the aforesaid reply, the respondent no.1/MCD shall grant a personal hearing to the private respondent no.2. iii. Based on the aforesaid, the respondent/MCD shall take appropriate action in accordance with law.
5. In the event the petitioner has any further grievance with regard to unauthorised construction, he is at liberty to take appropriate remedies in accordance with law.
6. All rights,
contentions and legal remedies of the owner/occupier/private respondent shall remain protected.
AMIT BANSAL, J MAY 22, 2026 Rzu This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/05/2026 at 13:14:20