Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9901 (BOM)

AKHIL STARIYA MAHA E SEVA AND AADHAR KENDRA SANGHATAN v. UNION OF INDIA THRU DEPT. AND ORS

WP/11669/2026 · 2026-09-21

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(28)-WP-11669-26.doc PANCHAL IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11669 OF 2026 Akhil Stariya Maha E-Seva And Aadhar Kendra Sanghatan ...Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents ... Mr. D. V. Sutar i/by Ms. Anjali B. Shaw, for the Petitioner. Ms. Dhanashree Bhate, for the Respondent No.1-State. Mrs. Neha S. Bhide, GP a/w Mrs. Apurva Thipsay, “B” Panel Counsel for Respondent No.2. ... CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C.: 1. At the outset, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2 has placed reliance on the order dated 21st August, 2026, indicating therein that the Application of Petitioner is already decided by the authority, a copy of which is furnished to the Petitioner’s Counsel. 2. Be that as it may. In case the Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 21st August 2026, which is taken on record and marked as ‘X’, it is always open to the Petitioner to invoke appropriate proceeding, in that regard, in accordance with law. 1 BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Digitally signed by BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Date: 2026.09.22 10:31:49 +0530 (28)-WP-11669-26.doc 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant Petition. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the instant Writ Petition is Disposed of, without adverting to the merits of the matter. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] 2