Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9901 (ALL)

VINAY YADAV @ VINAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

NA529/4813/2026 · 2026-09-29

Subhash Chandra Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4813 of 2026 Court No. - 78 HON'BLE SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The present application u/s 529 B.N.S.S. has been filed with prayer to allow the present application by directing the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.1, Prayagraj to decide the application dated 12.06.2025 Under Section 319 Cr.P.C./358 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, being Paper No.15क filed by the applicant in S.T. No. 1865 of 2023 (State Vs. Jai Prakash) arising out of Case Crime No. 205 of 2023, Under Section 498-A, 304-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station Phoolpur, District Prayagraj, pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.1, Prayagraj within some stipulated period. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in this case the applicant is informant and moved an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. before the learned trial court that is pending before the learned court concerned and has not been decided till now, therefore, request to direct the learned trial court to decide the aforesaid application expeditiously within a stipulated period of time. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer as aforesaid. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by learned counsel for applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perusal of record, the order sheet, it appears that an application under Section 319 Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinay Yadav @ Vinay Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Cr.P.C. moved on 12.06.2025 is still pending and has not been decided by the learned court, therefore, it is expedient to direct the learned trial court to make its endeavor to decide the application dated 12.06.2025 under Section 319 Cr.P.C. within a period of 60 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, in accordance with law, if there is no other legal impediment. With the aforesaid directions, the present application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. stands disposed of finally. September 30, 2026 Suraj Srivastav NA529 No. 4813 of 2026 2 (Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad