Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C ) No.1741 of 2026
Kailash Chandra Das
…. Petitioner Mr. J.K. Das, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Parties Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA
COROM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
ORDER 17.02.2026
1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer: Under the circumstances stated above, your Lordships may be graciously pleased to admit the writ application, call for records and issue RULE NISI calling upon the Opp.party as to why: (A) The petitioner shall not be reinstated in service from the date of his illegal termination by way of refusal of employment; (B) The services of the petitioner shall not be regularized from the date when his counterpart contemporary employees got regularized in the cadre; (C) The Hon'ble Court shall not direct the Opp party to pay the petitioner regular scale of pay with allowances as back wages; (D) It shall not be so directed to afford complete relief(s) to which the petitioner would be found entitled, p. 2p. 2 And in the event the petitioner fails to show cause or show insufficient cause, the Rule may be made absolute; And/or pass any other appropriate writ/writs,
order/orders the Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case; And for which act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound, shall ever pray.
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievances, Petitioner has made a representation before the sole Opposite Party vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing the Opposite Party to consider and dispose of the representation vide Annexure-4 to the Writ Petition, in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this
order with due communication to the Petitioner.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
sangita