Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9900 (JHR)

TAYAB ANSARI @ TAIYAB ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2210/2026 · 2026-03-20

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7896 1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2210 of 2026 Tayab Ansari @ Taiyab Ansari, aged about 25 years, S/o. Kyamuddin Asnari, R/o. Vill.- Garh Husir, P.O. & P.S.- Kanke, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, APP Order No.02/Dated- 20.03.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP. 2. The petitioner has been made an accused in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No. 201/2024, registered for offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2), 352, 74, 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, which is pending in the Court of learned J.M., 1st Class, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence at all rather he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is no specific allegation against this petitioner. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons, namely, Mojib Ansari @ Mojib, Murshid Ansari @ Murshid, Wajid Ansari and Ejaj Ansari have been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 18.03.2026 passed in B.A. No. 2172 of 2026 and order dated 16.03.2026 passed in B.A. No. 2042 of 2026 respectively and the allegations levelled against this petitioner is similar. Petitioner 2026:JHHC:7896 2 | P a g e undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case and abides by all terms and conditions which may be imposed. Hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. 4. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner but has fairly admitted that there are similar allegations against this petitioner with those of co-accused persons, who have been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I find substance in the contentions raised on behalf of petitioner. Therefore, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., 1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No. 201/2024 with condition that petitioner shall appear physically on each and every date during the trial of case till its conclusion unless his physical appearance is dispensed with for sufficient cause to the satisfaction of the learned trial court and with further condition that petitioner shall not indulge in tampering with the prosecution evidence or influence the witnesses or gain over them. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 20.03.2026 Rahul Uploaded on 23/03/2026