Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:795 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No. 431 of 2019 Decided on: 02.01.2026 __________________________________________________________
Kaushalya Devi
...Petitioner Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Others
...Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?.
For the petitioner: Dr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Hemant Kumar Verma, Deputy Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge
Dr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on Instructions, states that due to subsequent events, the petitioner does not intend to continue with the present proceedings. [Statement Taken on Record].
2. Prayer being innocuous is not opposed by Learned State Counsel also.
3. Taking into account the statement made by Learned Counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is closed.
2026:HHC:795 - 2 -
In aforesaid terms, the instant petition along with all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge 2nd January, 2026
[himani]