Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9898 (UTT)

MAJOR SANDEEP RANA v. UNION OF INDIA

WPSB/678/2024 · 2026-08-13

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010166542024 2026:UHC:7226-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB/678/2024 Major Sandeep Rana --Petitioner Versus Union of India & Others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Major Sandeep Rana, petitioner- in-person, through VC. Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Central Govt. Standing Counsel, for the Union of India. Mr. Piyush Tiwari, Central Govt. Standing Counsel, for the respondent no. 3, 4 and 5. (2) Petitioner is serving as Major in 130 Infantry Battalion, Territorial Army, Eco Kumaon at Pithoragarh since 13.12.2023. He was transferred to 120 Infantry Battalion, Territorial Army, Bihar, vide order dated 10.10.2024. Petitioner challenged the said order mainly on the ground that he is transferred before completion of normal duration of posting i.e. three years at Pithoragarh. Coordinate Bench passed interim order on 21.10.2024, staying the effect and operation of the transfer order till next date of listing. On the strength of that interim order, petitioner is continuing at Pithoragarh. (3) Learned Counsel for the respondents submits that the ground taken by petitioner for challenging his transfer is factually not correct; as per the policy, applicable to officers of Territorial Army, normal period of posting at one place is two years and not three years, as contended by UKHC010166542024 2026:UHC:7226-DB the petitioner. (4) Major Karan Singh Sandhu, Legal Officer, Territorial Army Directorate, Army Headquarters, New Delhi is physically present in Court. He made a statement that the competent authority will recall the transfer order, impugned in this writ petition, and pass fresh order of posting in respect of petitioner within four weeks. He further assures that permanent status, which petitioner is having right now, will not be disturbed because of his posting. He further assures that the competent authority will try to accommodate the petitioner at some peace or modified field station. (5) Law is well settled that judicial interference with order of transfer passed in respect of government servants has to be minimal and that is more so in case of army officers. This Court do not find any reason to interfere in the matter, especially when petitioner has served at one place for more than two and half years. (6) Writ petition is disposed of by taking the statement made by Major Karan Singh Sandhu on record. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 13.8.2026 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab 198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6 FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2026.08.13 19:51:54 +05'30' UKHC010166542024 2026:UHC:7226-DB