Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9897 (KAR)

S. R. VENKATESH REDDY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/1374/2026 · 2026-04-09

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19597 WP No. 1374 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 1374 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: S.R. VENKATESH REDDY S/O LATE M. RAMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT SOMAYAJALAPALLI, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 138. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.R. VISHWANATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR - 563 138. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR KOLAR SUB DIVISION KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 138. 4. THE TAHSILDAR SRINIVASAPURA TALUK Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19597 WP No. 1374 of 2026 KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 138. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO MAKE CONTINUE ENTRIES IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY NO. 31, MEASURING 2 ACRES AND 28 GUNTAS SITUATED AT RAGHUNATHAPURA VILLAGE, RONURU HOBLI, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT, IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER ANDPASS SUCH OTHER AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for all the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.4-Tahsildar has issued an endorsement at Annexure-E dated 03.10.2025, declining to enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records while pointing out that the Khata stands as "thoti inam". - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19597 WP No. 1374 of 2026 3. Learned High Court Government Pleader submits that when it is clear that the RTC in column No.9 reflects the name "thoti inam", it would be impermissible for the Tahsildar to accept the claim of the petitioner and enter the name of the petitioner without the name "thoti Inam" being removed from the RTC in a manner known to law. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the handwritten RTCs produced at Annexure-A series reflect the name of the petitioner's father, Sri M. Rama Reddy, and therefore, the petitioner having succeeded to the estate of late Sri M. Rama Reddy, the petitioner is entitled to have his name entered in the revenue records. 5. On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader and on perusing the petition papers, this Court is of the considered opinion that there is substance in the submission made by the learned High Court Government Pleader. So long as the revenue records reflect the name "thoti inam", the petitioner cannot seek to enter his name in the revenue records unless - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19597 WP No. 1374 of 2026 the name "thoti inam" is removed from the RTC in a manner known to law. 6. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Learned High Court Government Pleader is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2