Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9896 (CAL)

SUBRATA BHUNIA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/4688/2026 · 2026-04-17

Suvra Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.04.2026 rc/ct.no.15 Item No.30 WPA No. 4688 of 2026 Subrata Bhunia Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Anupam Mr. Bhattacharjee Mr. M. Saha Mr. Himadri Ghosh ..for the petitioner Mr. Chittapriya Ghosh Mr. S. Ghosh …for the respondent no.8 Mr. Keshab Chandra Das ….for the State Mr. Siddhartha Sarkar …for the respondent no.6 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the private respondent has raised unauthorized construction on the property adjoining the petitioner’s property in violation of the building rules. Learned counsel for the private respondent submits that the private respondent has been granted a sanctioned building plan in terms of which the construction is being raised. On the prayer of the petitioner liberty is granted to submit a comprehensive representation before the Pradhan, Kotalpur Gram Panchayat, being the 6th respondent herein, ventilating his grievance within 7 days from date. The 6th respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the same within six weeks from the date of receipt thereof upon granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to all concerned including the petitioner and the private respondent or their authorized representative(s), in accordance with law. The parties shall be at liberty to produce relevant documents in support of their contention before the concerned authority at the time of hearing. The 6th respondent shall be at liberty to take all measures required for the purpose of consideration of the representation. The decision taken by the authority shall be communicated to the parties within a week thereof. In the event the construction raised by the private respondent is found to be unauthorised/illegal, the concerned authority shall take necessary steps, in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh,J) 2